Regional Geocaching Policies Wiki
All geocachers should follow the Geocaching Guidelines. The Guidelines are supported with detailed articles that are found in the Geocaching Help Centre.
Table of Contents |
---|
For caches placed in Ontario, Canada the direction provided on this page will also apply.
New to the game? Welcome! Geocaching HQ encourages geocachers ("cachers") to find at least 20 geocaches ("caches") before setting out to hide their own.
The greater variety of geocaches that someone finds, the better they should understand how to create enjoyable experiences for others.
Ontario - Adequate GPS Usage
As per the Guidelines, GPS usage is an essential element of hiding and seeking caches.
Online maps should never be used as the source of coordinates for cache placement.
Accurate coordinates are crucial - for this reason, coordinates must be obtained with a GPS-enabled device.
As part of the hunt, a cache must require that finders navigate to a set of specific coordinates with a GPS-enabled device.
A waypoint projection from a fixed point is often a good method of reinforcing adequate GPS usage.
A cache must not be found with clues alone (even if it is a Letterbox Hybrid cache). Clues may be listed as the secondary finding method on the cache page.
Image puzzles where a location can only be determined by knowing where a photo was taken are not publishable; additional information (e.g. specific coordinates or the name of the park/site where the photo was taken) must also be provided.
Ontario - Adoption of Cache Pages/Transfer of Ownership
Reviewers do not have the ability to initiate a cache page adoption (i.e. transfer ownership of a cache page) from one Player account to another.
Only the owner of an active cache page can initiate an adoption request to another Player by visiting http://www.geocaching.com/adopt .
Geocaching HQ will not process an ownership transfer of a cache page without written permission from the cache owner or their estate.
An Archive action is intended to be permanent; once Archived a cache page is no longer a candidate for adoption.
Ontario - Cache Types / Tips for an Efficient Review
Before clicking Submit For Review cache owners should post a Reviewer Note with the details of the container, the hiding method and/or specifics of where/how the elements of the cache are placed.
A Reviewer may question Difficulty and Terrain ratings if the details on the cache page or Reviewer Notes do not appear to reflect the circumstances of the hide.
If a Mystery cache incorporates/includes a puzzle element, the solution/explanation of how to solve the puzzle needs to be included in a Reviewer Note.
Geocaching HQ provide reference articles that will assist in the determining the most appropriate Size, Difficulty and Terrain ratings for a cache page.
When a cache is at the posted coordinates - it is typically defined as a Traditional cache; in some situations where the Field Puzzle attribute may be appropriate.
If the posted coordinates need to be visited in order to gain obtain offset information (e.g. information used to find the subsequent elements of a cache) - it is typically a Multi-cache.
For caches where the posted coordinates do not need to be visited (they are "fake") - or when locating/accessing the cache requires internet access (e.g. using a webpage or "checker" to access coordinates for a redirect) it is typically a Mystery cache.
A physical cache that contains a stamp may be listed as Letterbox Hybrid cache; text such as "This cache contains a stamp that is not a trade item" should be included in the cache page to assist the Reviewer and potential finders.
If a Wherigo cartridge is used with a cache - it must be the Wherigo cache type. The cache page must include a link to a unique cartridge file that is located/hosted on Wherigo.com .
A Bonus cache is always the Mystery Cache type. Bonus cache coordinates that are revealed by finding clues or coordinates in other caches or (an Adventure Lab).
EarthCaches in Ontario are not Reviewed by the Ontario Reviewer Team - they are handled by our awesome colleague, geoawareCA.
Ontario - Challenge Caches
Click here to visit the Geocaching HQ Help Centre Article - "Hiding A Geocache - Challenge Caches".
Click here to visit the Geocaching HQ Help Centre Article - "Hiding A Geocache - Challenge Checkers".
The quotes below are from the Geocaching HQ articles linked above; text in bold has been provided by the Ontario Reviewer Team as clarification.
"Challenge cache owners must demonstrate that there are plenty of qualifying caches to meet the challenge at the time of publication."
"If only a few people can find and log a challenge cache, then it’s almost like a private cache. (And private caches aren’t permitted on the website)."
If there are a limited/restrictive number of qualifying caches available for a Challenge Cache, it may not be Guidelines compliant.
Challenges that rely on one-time Events and Awards (such as Souvenirs that can no longer be acquired) may not be Guidelines compliant.
”Challenge cache owners must show that they have met the challenge".
“A challenge cache needs to appeal to and be attainable by a reasonable number of cachers. Your reviewer may ask for a list of cachers from your area who qualify."
The Ontario Reviewer Team consider the "reasonable number of cachers" to be 10 (in addition to the cache owner); they should be based within Ontario.
"The container must be placed at coordinates on the listing, either as posted coordinates, or as a visible additional waypoint."
The coordinates of a container for a Challenge Cache must be visible; Challenge Caches cannot have puzzle elements or hidden waypoints.
"Difficulty rating (should) be based on the challenge, the terrain rating on the challenge cache location."
The terrain rating of a Challenge Cache should be rated as if it were a Traditional cache in the same location.
"Challenge caches published after April 21, 2015 must include a link to a web-based challenge checker. At this time, Project-GC is the only website approved to host challenge checkers."
All Challenge caches must have a unique Project-GC challenge checker, even if qualification could be verified by visiting the profile page/statistics of a Player. Proof of qualification in a log (e.g. GC codes or bookmarks of qualifiers) should not be requested for a Challenge cache published after April 21, 2015. The onus is on the cache owner to verify that Finders have met qualifying requirements, using the Project-GC Challenge Checker on the cache page. The Project-GC website has a Frequently Asked Questions page with more information.
"Challenge Caches are sometimes difficult to review for publication due to the subjectivity involved. Meaning, one person’s opinion can differ from another's, which can cause issues in the review process. One of the goals of the 2016 guideline update for challenge caches was to reduce some of that subjectivity. However, we can’t completely remove subjectivity from the process."
The Ontario Reviewer Team strives to be consistent with Reviews for cache pages in Ontario.
The approach to Reviews is considered to be "provincial", not "regional" - as the arbitrary definition of a region/area can be subjective.
“Please do not submit a challenge cache in an area where a very similar or identical challenge cache already exists.”
A Challenge Cache may need to be relocated if a similar Challenge cache is noted to be within 50km, as measured by Google Maps shortest driving route.
Items listed below with bullet points are quotes from the Geocaching HQ articles above; text in bold has been provided by the Ontario Reviewer Team as clarification.
"Challenge cache owners must demonstrate that there are plenty of qualifying caches to meet the challenge at the time of publication."
"If only a few people can find and log a challenge cache, then it’s almost like a private cache. (And private caches aren’t permitted on the website)."
If there are a limited/restrictive number of qualifying caches available for a Challenge cache, it may not be Guidelines compliant.
Challenges that rely on one-time Events and Awards (such as Souvenirs that can no longer be acquired) may not be Guidelines compliant.
Challenge cache owners must show that they have met the challenge".
“A challenge cache needs to appeal to and be attainable by a reasonable number of cachers. Your reviewer may ask for a list of cachers from your area who qualify."
The Ontario Reviewer Team consider the "reasonable number of cachers" to be 10 (in addition to the cache owner); they should be based within Ontario.
"The container must be placed at coordinates on the listing, either as posted coordinates, or as a visible additional waypoint."
The coordinates of a container for a Challenge cache must be visible; Challenge caches cannot have puzzle elements or hidden waypoints.
"Difficulty rating (should) be based on the challenge, the terrain rating on the challenge cache location."
The terrain rating of a Challenge cache should be rated as if it were a Traditional cache in the same location.
"Challenge caches published after April 21, 2015 must include a link to a web-based challenge checker. At this time, Project-GC is the only website approved to host challenge checkers."
All Challenge caches must have a unique Project-GC challenge checker, even if qualification could be verified by visiting the profile page/statistics of a Player. Proof of qualification in a log (e.g. GC codes or bookmarks of qualifiers) should not be requested for a Challenge cache published after April 21, 2015. The onus is on the cache owner to verify that Finders have met qualifying requirements, using the Project-GC Challenge Checker on the cache page. The Project-GC website has a Frequently Asked Questions page with more information.
"Challenge caches are sometimes difficult to review for publication due to the subjectivity involved. Meaning, one person’s opinion can differ from another's, which can cause issues in the review process. One of the goals of the 2016 guideline update for challenge caches was to reduce some of that subjectivity. However, we can’t completely remove subjectivity from the process."
The Ontario Reviewer Team strives to be consistent with Reviews for cache pages in Ontario.
The approach to Reviews is considered to be "provincial", not "regional" - as the arbitrary definition of a region/area can be subjective.
“Please do not submit a challenge cache in an area where a very similar or identical challenge cache already exists.”
Challenge caches may need to be relocated if another Challenge cache is noted to be within 50km, as measured by Google Maps shortest driving route.
Other guidance :
If a Challenge Cache features stacked (or multiple layers) of qualifying criteria, a Reviewer may request that separate caches with less complex/